Backgrounds of the Third World War. The reasons for the emergence of the Third World War! Possible causes of 3 World War

29.03.2021 Repairs

Russia, China and Iran are preparing to withstand the United States, as a result of this confrontation, a third world war may arise. How did countries come to this? The prerequisites for the Third World War appeared, as it is not strange, even during the Second World War, when 44 Casmen's countries signed the Bretton Woods Agreement, as a result of which the US dollar became world currency.

All countries tied their money to the dollar, thereby concluding the exchange rate for countries. Once of gold at that time began to cost $ 35 and that is why the United States made banknotes exchange. The federal reserve system was rapid gold, which exchanged on the currency that other countries used exclusively for international calculations. In August 1971, many countries realized that the United States plays dishonest. In the federal reserve bank, there was more money to appear than it was required that the United States bought in exchange of gold from them. After the coating of the gold dollar decreased from 55% to 22% of the country began to leave the Bretton Woods Agreement and demand their gold back.

To such a turn of the US events were not ready, therefore the American President Nixon, unilaterally terminated this agreement, as a result of which the dollar ceased to be a world currency and its value was rapidly declining. In 1973, Nixon promised Saudi Arabia military protection of their petroleum fields, thereby received Saudi Arabia as a partner who sold oil to other states, but for US dollars. Other countries were in a hopeless situation, as they were obliged to supply the necessary goods in the United States, and the United States in turn was paid by the money printed from the air. Further, this currency was called petrodollar.

All countries were involuntarily dependent on America, as oil was needed to everyone. In 1991, the United States entered Iraq, and after 100 hours after the invasion of the war ended. Iraq literally was a stuff from the face of the earth, the United States destroyed everything that is necessary for the country's vital activity. While Clinton stood in power, the people of Iraq died of hunger, diseases, lack of minimal medical services. 10 years later, in 2000, Iraq said it stops selling oil for American currency. Now he was going to sell his oil exclusively for the euro.

The United States did not endure such an outcomes of Iraq, as a result of which, after a short time, all US citizens were confident that Iraq hides al-Kayeda and that they have a powerful weapon of mass defeat. March 20, 2003, the United States again entered Iraq, this time Iraq was able to answer Americans, albeit with big losses for themselves. Americans again began to control the sale of Iraqi oil, which again began to be sold for the American currency.

In the occupation, Iraq was located for 9 years. The plans of America had to conquer not only Iraq, as well as Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. In February 2011, Gaddafi hopes to get rid of the dollar and the euro, for which it creates a group called Dinar. According to Gaddafi, the countries that entered this group refused world currencies and sold their products and services exclusively for gold dinars.

After such a move, Libya fell on the shelling by NATO countries and the United States, and Gaddafi was killed. In February 2012, Iran made the last attempt to get rid of the dollar, declaring that this time Iranian oil would be sold for gold. The United States again attempted to destroy Iran's economy.

Backgrounds of the Third World War.
M. A. Gaysin

Let's start the reasoning on the subject with an interview about the secret Martian bases.

So, Andrei Dmitrievich Basiago and Laura Magdalina Eisenhower talked about the existence of a secret colony located on Mars in a joint interview at the "Radio Exopolitical" with Alfred Lambromonte Webrom.

Lawyer from Cambridge Andrei Dmitrievich Basiago, who lives in Washington, said that he was twice on the basis of the United States, on Mars. He fell there by teleportation from the CIA military facility to El Segundo, California.

Ms. Eisenhower, Hispanic of US President Duight Eisenhower was recruited CIA in 2006, when she was 33. To take part in the project and become a secret settlement of Mars, she had to leave his personal life, actually start everything from scratch.

They told how the secret Martian colony is financed that money comes from the black budget, military and intelligence sources. The base is created as a survival mechanism for the human genome if the solar flares, a nuclear war, or any other cataclysm, will end with the life of a person on Earth.

During the interview, they announced that they disagree with many factors of the Martian colony. They said that when recruiting recruits for flight to Mars, the CIA resorts to various methods, including psychological manipulations.

Basiago argues that there are currently persons who have Aryan blood, which does not represent the genetic diversity of the whole human race on Earth.

Analysis of the information received from Basiago and Mrs. Eisenhuer information.

In the interview, there are doubts of two statements, the fact that the base is on Mars, and the fact that there can be reached by teleportation.

By the way, the second statement applies not even to the science of the future, as the first, but is just fantastic.

Then the question arises where these bases are actually being. And they, in fact, are on earth and are secret underground bases (cities).

The question is why earthly underground bases are represented as Martian. And the answer is very simple and associated with the supercinence of the project.

First, the approval of Mars flights by teleportation, will cause complete distrust of the listeners.

Secondly, participants of the flight to Mars are initially ready for the fact that the road is only one way. Thus, they do not expect any vacations and return returns to Earth.

It is clear from the interview that after the Global Nuclear War on Earth will remain only people of Aryan blood, and no person living on the surface of the earth cannot count on salvation.

But in order for the Global Nuclear War to begin, it is necessary that one of the major nuclear powers made the first nuclear strike on another major nuclear power.

Russia and China are not suitable for this role, since their nuclear forces were created not for aggression, but to prevent the nuclear aggression of a potential opponent, that is, the United States.

Only one country in the world is suitable for this role. But even the United States will not agree to make the first nuclear strike, if it is not confident in his impunity.

Here for this purpose and the wording about the global disarming nuclear strike in Russia was invented. Where for Americans a key word is the word "disarming." That for US Congressmen is synonymous with the word "unposted."

Although with the full use of nuclear weapons, the population of Europe, Russia, China and the United States will be erased from the face of the Earth. The global missile strike by thousands of "Tomahaws" will be the end of life on the planet Earth. This is the opinion of military experts.

In order for the return nuclear strike in Western Europe, the Americans will bring nuclear weapons to the nuclear weapons.

What for the so-called secret global government is required. Since they want to begin the development of a new Civilization based on Aryan blood. And be able to control the population of the Earth within 500 million people.

For Russia, the only guarantee of its security is the confidence that Western countries have not been crazy.

The author of the article believes that collective immunity begins for indirect signs of the West. Example, the journalist accused the Minister of Defense of Great Britain in sexual harassment, as if what happened 15 years ago. This charges served as a reason for the resignation of a high-ranking official from his position. What is the sexual harassment of this official, and in the fact that he put his hand on the knee of journalist.

We will analyze this incident. First, a young journalist, a light flirt could use to get a more frank interview. It could be even not afflicted by her behavior. An official in his simplicity could show a response men's reaction. Even if it is not the case, she could simply lose his hand from his knee and forget, since such an incident is not worth a given egg. And so unfortunately blame him in this 15 years, this is just a zone of madness.

Without the evaluative accusations of women in the sexual harassment of famous men, avalanche-like in the West is growing. The time comes when any natural male attention to a woman will be classified as sexual harassment.

Rhetorical question, and then families will form, and children are born.

In the West there was a tendency to choose and appoint women to the highest government posts. Many of this trend are positive. Indeed, democracy and gender equality in action.

But in fact, it is a direct path to degradation of the elite of control. And that's why, women in the mental plan are small people, and without exceptions. Whatever, women did not disappoint, most men in the mental plan are also small people, but among them there are still exceptions.

To show what the stereo thinking of a small man is, I will give an example, for example, his attitude to the Malevich's picture "Black Square". The media presents this picture as a highly artistic work. A small person will not come out of the standard of society, will also consider this picture with highly artistic work. Although in fact it is just a canvas painted in black and the cost of it cannot exceed the cost of the frame.

What is dangerous "little man" in politics. So that they are easy to manipulate. For this, nothing special needs. It is enough to have a media ownership. Currently, Western media are managed from one center. It can be assumed that this center is the so-called secret global government.

Now Russophobia is artificially injected in Western media, and, accordingly, the "small person" of the West is in the Russophobian mood.

Example, Female Defense Minister of Defense Germany recently proposed to apply strength against Russia. This shows the complete incompetence of this woman for his position. Since it should know from history than such adventures for her country ends.

The current confrontation of the West with Russia is associated with Ukraine. The West claims that Russia occupied part of Ukraine. In fact, this is not the case, since this part of Russia was under the occupation of Ukraine.

It is easily proved when Russia and Ukraine were a single country part of the territory of Russia (Novorossia and Crimea) were part of Ukraine on the conventional administrative division of the country. At that time, the administrative division of the country was convention, as the country was united.

Currently, the conditional boundaries became real, and, accordingly, part of the territory of Russia turned out to be under the occupation of Ukraine. Crimea managed to return, Donbass and Lugansk with weapons in their hands, defend their right, will return to Russia. But, unfortunately, most of the Novorossia remained under the occupation.

Due to the misunderstanding of this reality, the West may begin aggression against Russia. This aggression may be the beginning of the Third World War. The danger of war increases, even the fact that Western Europe has no independence, and the so-called secret world government pushes the West to apply the first global nuclear strike.

The proof of this assumption is the statement of the ill-fated Minister of Defense of Great Britain on the possibility of applying the first nuclear strike. It is clear to whom. No Englishman with a normal psyche wants to support such a statement, as it can imagine that it becomes with the UK as a result of a response strike. But the Minister of Defense and did not express the opinion of the British, he simply voiced the decision made, the so-called secret global government.

The condition for applying the first global nuclear strike in Russia for the United States is confidence in his impunity. But the Barguzin rocket train disengaged in Russia resets this confidence. And here we have been observing the possibility of the so-called secret global government.

Russia without reasonable explanation declared the termination of the development of the Barguzin rocket train. The financial argument can not be the cause of the abolition of this development, as the safety of Russia is worth it.

Russia's decision to refuse to develop a Barguzin missile train during writing this article. Everyone knows that the United States respects only power. And the voluntary refusal of Russia from his strength, which she got from the USSR, is not just surprising, but leads to horror. After all, it is possible to put on the model of the so-called secret global government to the complete disappearance of Russia from the face of the Earth.

In early February 2018, the US President Donald Trump may begin a large-scale campaign on the confiscation of foreign assets of Russian oligarchs. We can talk about the amount from one to two trillion dollars.

Oligarchs to save their trillions with all their mights will fight Russia under the US. After all, it is clear to everyone that the Russian oligarchs are only formally citizens of Russia. And in reality, their children, at home and money are abroad. Moreover, money is in offshores and are not legal, and for the Western legal system, this money is equivalent to criminal.

December 24, 2017 In the transfer of Vladimir Solovyov analysts, Casually reviewed Russia's refusal to further develop a Barguzin rocket train. Sensible analysts came to the conclusion that having rocket systems are sufficient and rocket train "Barguzin" is redundant in the defense of the country. Analysts in their arguments make two mistakes. The first mistake, they think that Russia's opponents are also sensible people. And the second mistake is that they think that the so-called global government needs real US security. In fact, they need only the illusion of non-taucascence of the first nuclear strike, which should be created from congressmen and the President of the United States and nothing more.

France President Francois Hollande stated that if the conflict in the Middle East was not resolved, he could lead to the "Total War", reports Reuters.

That is, to the third world.

(I organize a personal investigation into the material person to think, you will fight for the heading in further issues, about the possible beginning of the Third World War.)

In principle, Alland is not a fool and he is right. I have long been watching the situation in the world. I look like more than more sides are drawn, as it would seem, in small conflicts. Build military power at home. But everyone has long been known that even an uncharged rifle, at least once he shoots.

By and large, the background of the occurrence of the Third World War is not unreasonable.

This is a well-known economic crisis. For example, turn to the past:

Events preceding war

On October 24, 1929, an oblivion of the course of American shares on the New York Stock Exchange occurred. The collapse of the stock market followed a crisis in the US banking system. Under these conditions, lending to the German economy was completely discontinued, moreover, a massive outflow of capital began. Due to the reduction in the volume of international trade, the export-oriented economy of Germany began to fall. A decrease in demand for German goods led to an increase in unemployment and increasing the budget deficit. Nothing reminds?

Huge debts of states involved in various conflicts and wars.

Situation in this example:

Some facts from history before the beginning of World War II:

In the period from 1929 to 1932, GDP decreased by 25%, industrial production by 40%, agricultural by 30%, and unemployment reached 50%. Salary has everywhere, Locauts and strikes began at the enterprises. The anti-crisis "deflationary" policy of the Bunning Cabinet involved the reduction of state (first of all - social) allocations from the budget, an increase in the tax burden, the banking sphere. The government managed to prevent the collapse of the German financial system due to mass interventions - aimed at redemption of the obligations of large problem banks, restructuring their debt and the introduction of permanent banking supervision. However, other activities carried out only aggravated the crisis in the German economy - the fall continued, and the social tensions and discontent of citizens asked the situation sharply increased.

Demographic crisis with refugees.

Refugees to give something like and nowhere. The concentration camps, so far, do not build. You do not yet. And so the loss of the population in hostilities is inevitable.

The following is a overproduction crisis. When the output is. Many examples

After all, these production facilities are not involved in this period. Sanctions, it means the production is essential to the domestic market, mainly. Now, after all, we have large conglomerations in the world, such as the EU. That is, all EU countries producing products supply it again to the European Union. The same situation was observed in Germany in the beginning of World War II.

And if, again, turn your eyes on The prerequisites of the Second World War, then we will see that this war began, just from afar. And specifically, with Africa and the Middle East. Exhaust script - isn't it ??? For checking, forces for detailed workout, not on paper.

A look into the past:

The North African military campaign, in which the allied troops and the "axis" countries held a series of attacks and counterattacks in the deserts of North Africa, has been launched from 1940 to 1943. Libya has been the Italian colony for several decades, and the neighboring Egypt was under the control of Great Britain since 1882. When In 1940, Italy declared war to the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition, the fighting immediately began between the two states.
September 13, 1940 Army Marshal Graziani began an offensive in North Africa from Libya to Egypt.

Original version of the site

This is currently all. To be continued

To start postulate.

All civilizations on all planets pass the stage of large wars, which we call the world, in a chronologically very narrow range of our development - when civilization begins to move from agriculturality to industry. That is, it ceases to feed "from the soil" and builds a large-scale technosphere, massively coagulating to the city. We are interested in exactly the moment of the beginning of the demographic transition, when the rural population is still fully, and it can be mobilized into multi-million army, and the industry already puffs, allowing you to make enough productive murder tools that can bring the death of the death multi-million "yields".

The civilized world of our planet (the so-called "West") has already played his world wars. The developed countries have no mobilization potential for world wars, so we switched to special operations and hybrid wars.

Other thing is the third world ...

The physicist Sergey Kapitsa, who applied physical methods for the study of population and thereby making a considerable contribution to science demography, somehow in a personal conversation told me:

I do not exclude that the Third World War will be. But it will be within the third world. Somewhere in the Middle East.

The fact of personal conversation, I mentioned not boasting for the sake, but exclusively for those who read the work of Kapitsa, but I did not find this allegation. Maybe it is somewhere, but I personally did not come across, because I refer to my own ears.

A person who is engaged in something long, begins to feel the material studied - the fabric of his subject, as the tesla electricity felt, as the mechanics of Archimedes felt. So Kapitsa felt the planet, more precisely, the matter of her billiona population. And it seems to me that he was not mistaken in his prophecy.

Because, in addition to Kapitsa, there are other people who are engaged in population and his behavior in large (temporary and quantitative) scales. For example, the climatologist Vladimir Klimenko, which I wrote a whole book at one time. Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences Klimenko is influenced by climate fluctuations on human history. And if briefly, then his conclusions are: in the era of the worsening of the climate begins every nerves. Namely, the empire is stronger, great conquests are carried out. And in the era of improving the climate of the Empire, on the contrary, they fall apart, the intellect and rutting begin.

At the same time, it is necessary to clearly understand: climate fluctuations in one (cooling) or other (warming) side lead to different consequences in different regions of the globe. Because the climate is the phenomenon of "spotted." For example, global warming, which we are now experiencing, in some places planet leads to improved climate. So, let's say, it happens in Russia, where the retreat of permafrost will give Russian new arable land in size from France. That is why we live in the disintegrating empire ... Well, and somewhere, on the contrary, there is a sharp deterioration in the climate due to the drainage. This happens in arid zones. That is, in the Middle East. It smells like integration processes.

Do you know that only last year the amount of precipitation in Iran decreased by 20%? Two thirds (!) Iranian cities and towns suffer from a catastrophic lack of water. Thousands of villages live on imported water.

The once-free and wide river of Iranian Highlands Zyanydrud, who provided hundreds of thousands of people, currently ceased to exist. She completely dryed! And the largest Lake Urmia over the past twenty years has lost 95% of water reserves. It resembles a tragedy with our Aral Sea. People who served there in the Central Asian shipping company are still alive. And now Aral is not, and huge ships lie on the seamy salt dried day ...

Today in Iran, the water catastrophe is regarded as danger number 1, overtaking even such an enemy as Israel. And the UN with this opinion of the Iranian establishment agreed, because all Iran village and the city turn into a desert. If this goes further (and it will go), 70% of the inhabitants of Iranian Highlands will be forced to leave him, because it is impossible to live in this desert. What is 70% of Iranians?

This is 60 million people - so for a minute. Where to go?

And this is happening not only in Iran. Pakistan. Syria, Jordan, Egypt ... Egypt, once fading the grain with the whole Roman empire, now cuts wheat from Russia. In Egypt, the problem of draining is aggravated by the fact that in the dehydration of Ethiopia, from where the NIL follows, began to build dams, deciding to keep the precious resource. Turkey is doing the same - blows up its rivers flowing into Syria. Bringing the Euphrates of Dambia, the Turks on the third reduced the influx of fresh water in Syria. It is not enough ourselves!

In Yemen, in some areas, water soldering is already cut to 1 liter per day per person.

More than 400 thousand wells dried in Syria. As a result, a quarter of a million peasants were forced to leave spaced spaces.

In Iraq, in the north of this country, grain landing fell by 95%. There, even traditional dates are growing increasingly and more difficult - if earlier Iraq had 33 million phenomena in Iraq, then only 8 million remained. Water with nothing!

In other words, we have a situation of scissors: on the one hand, the population's rapidly growing due to the high fertility, on the other - rapidly reducing resources. The carrying capacity of the territory drops sharply. And where to give tens of millions of unnecessary mouths?

They are simply doomed to burn in the fire of a big war. It happened in history always. First, in the territory with a worsening climate, there is a severe intersubita, as a result of which the power takes someone one - the most cruel and irreconcilable (the empire crystallizes), and then the military campaign should be on the gradient of moisture.

Whether the campaign will be happening at this time, given that the country is the richest water - Russia, as well as the fact that it is in Russia that "traditionally Islamic lands" are located, for example, for example, the Islamic state - the first contendent for the imperial grain crystallization? Can we hope that the fire of the third world will not attend us, and will safely burn out the excess population only inside the arid range?

Are tens of millions of unnecessary people "up" are clicked - first in the soft boost of Russia - Central Asia, and then in Russia itself? And will Russia be able to take advantage of his nuclear weapons if infiltration will occur as in the anecdote about the Chinese - "numerous small detachments of one hundred thousand people"? One thing is clear - there are no demographic resources for such war.

Will we will help us in the struggle, given that with the West, and with the whole world, we managed to raise it because they attacked our closest alignment - Ukraine, who also won't help us? Would you have for this Judino betrayal to pay a terrible price?

First of all, let's remember that we live in the era of the competition economy, which in itself involves a tough economic rivalry between competing structures. The greatest benefit receives the one who has the opportunity (military, economic) to destroy its competitors. That is why, often, economic rivalry develops into force pressure and even into the power methods of the physical destruction of the opponent, while at the same time appropriating his property.

We see an analogy at the interstate level. Economically stronger states are trying to "stride under themselves" more weak rivals. If this does not work with economic measures, weapons are going on, just as it is done in business. It is the principle of the economy of competition that leads to wars.

Wars for humanity even for the last 100-200 years old have become so common, that this is no longer surprised, but especially and does not scare if it does not affect everyone personally. But sometimes the wars develop into world when many countries of the world are drawn into an armed conflict. And this is already bothering fear.

Why are world wars arise and whether the next world slaughter is possible?

I dare to argue that world wars arise when two most cost-effective states appear on the global economic field (stronger than any other or even a group of countries), which adhere to the same economic practice.

At the same time, Russia should be one of the rival states. An opponent can be any other country regardless of its location. But the prerequisite for the early war war should be the same type of economic relations in Russia and its main economic competitor.

Let's turn to the examples. War of 1812. It can rightly be considered the First World War, as all countries of Europe were drawn into it. In Russia, the imperial state, in France Napoleon also coronated himself by the emperor. From an economic point of view and there, and there has developed the economy of monarchist monopoly (when the economy is subject to the will of one person and works in the interests, above all, this person). Two states became rivals for the markets of raw materials and sales of products.

World War I. In Europe at the beginningThe XX century Germany has occurred economically. Russia also did not lag behind. Introduction of the Golden Ruble in 1895, as well as reforms 1908-1911. Also led to its economic flourishing. Both countries again adhered to the same economic practice - the economy of monarchist monopolism was at the stage of transition to the economy of state monopolism. The war between them was inevitable.

The Second World War. Again, steadily developing Germany and again economically strong Russia. And again, both countries have the same type of economic relations - the economy of state monopoly (when the economy is subject to public interest and works, first of all, in the interests of the state management machine, which do not necessarily have to coincide with the interests of the majority of the population of this state). And again war.

Now let's see why there was no war between the USSR and the USA? After all, two economically powerful states very actively fought for their spheres of their not only political, but, above all, economic influence. Yes, the USSR fought with the United States in Vietnam, in Afghanistan ... N O other countries were not drawn into these wars. These wars did not exceed the world.

The secret is simple - these were two different economic systems. Therefore, rivalry between them proceeded in the economic sphere. Since the market economy is more viable, she won, sending the Soviet Union to the dust shelves of history.

Why was there no war between the United States and the newly formed by Russia? Why is she not so far? The answer again to search needle.

First, the United States and Russia have economic practices different. Russian leadership Although decides wish Build a market economy of the Western Sample, but so far only a criminal economy has been created in the "Yeltsin" Russia, which has nothing to do with the American type of economy.

With the arrival of Putin's power in Russia, state control of citizens' income is strengthened, and thanks to this state control of all other areas of life of the country's people (it should be noted that the most strict control of income has the United States). However, in Russia, this leads to the emergence of the economy of monopolism of power structures (when the economy is subject to the interests of the development of the power structures of the state and works, first of all, in the interests of these power structures - army, police, tax, customs services, intelligence services and counterintelligence, ships, etc. P.). And, no matter how it sounded blasphemmed, tragedies in the country (terroristrates, floods, fires, etc.) are beneficial for the newly created power structure - the Ministry of Emergency Situations. Than they are more, the more money receives this ministry, the higher their income, and therefore, and more can be stealing, writing off everything in nature or terrorists, driving millions and even billions of money for the needs of politics (the same election company).

In addition, Putinskaya Russia has intensified the penetration of criminal principles in the administrative and economic activities of the state apparatus.

Thus, the Russian economy is still different from the US economy.

Fortunately (otherwise you can not say) Medvedev is not able to rebuild the Russian economy to the market paw on the western pattern. Developing the principles of the market economy of the Western type in Russia, you can bring the world to the edge of the next world slaughter.

In addition, today Russia is still quite weak economically, so it could not and should not be an economic competitor for the United States.

However, the gradual economic development of Russia and the economic problems of recent years in the United States can very quickly equalize these countries, primarily economically. At the same time, it is probably not Russia will catch up with the United States, developing its own economy, and the United States is Russia, collapsed its own. And then for the fact that it will be avoidedi, as they say, and a penny of broken will not give.

Mankind and, above all, the Russians, it's time to understand - in Russia it is impossible to build the economy of the Western type. Prosperity in such an economy will be short-lived - the war will meet everything achieved, not to mention human lives. Of course, as always, Russia will win, but what price?

How then to be Russia, you ask? What and stirred in poverty, to remain a raw material appendage of more developed economies?

Of course not. In Russia, it is necessary to build a fundamentally new type of economy - the ideal market model is an absolutely uncrucified economy, an economy in which there will be no inflation and unemployment, poverty and monopolism in all its forms, when everyone will have equal economic rights and obligations, including the state itself.

Building such an economy will very quickly bring Russia into leaders in the economic space of our planet. But war between Russia and the United States will not, no matter how threatened the rulers of the United States, whatever do, economic models in countries will be different.

Only economic rivalry between the countries (maybe with the new "Cold War") intensify. The main thing will not be bloody Mass. Naturally, the "ideal market model" will win in an economic competition, since she is more abnormal than the economy of competition, due to its humanistic orientation. Naturally, in this case, the state of the United States of America will fall into the same way as it happened from the USSR.

And I must say that it is long to wait. 2027 may be the last year of the US existence on the political map of the world (and maybe it will happen before).